| To: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners | 
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> | 
| Reply-to: | ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Date: | Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:37:06 -1000 | 
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Oops. I should have said "too good to be true" > If an antenna system's frequency > or band coverage seems to good to be true, it may really be true, > usually at the expense of poor efficiency on some or all frequencies. > > > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners, Ken Brown | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] FS: Omni VI plus with PS, Tod Glenn | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners, Ken Brown | 
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners, Jim WA9YSD | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |