To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) |
From: | RaySoifer@cs.com |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:12:43 EST |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 2/26/2008 5:37:22 PM GMT Standard Time, w2wg@comcast.net writes: > In my > case I am willing to pay for the second RX. Others may find a full blown > second rx not to be worth the $$$. I would too, and would be willing to give up general coverage to get it (I use my Argonaut V for SW reception anyway). However, I would have no use for decoding-panadaptor support or enhanced computer control features, since I am mainly a DXer rather than a serious contester. I suppose it is issues like that which make jobs like Jack's and Scott's so tough. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!), Robert Carroll |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 6.3 MHz I-F filters for Corsair, earlier Omni's, Paragon are discontinued, KEN RINDFLEISCH |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!), Duane Calvin |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] RX-320 sub-receiver test, Rick Denney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |