TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] O2_dreps_top_spot

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] O2_dreps_top_spot
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:27:48 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
We are also getting on the edge of repeatable measurement accuracy and 
performance that can vary from radio to radio from the same build due to 
normal component tolerance and alignment accuracy.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kim Elmore" <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] O2_dreps_top_spot


> Even so, the O II is still no slouch!  When these sorts of levels are
> reached, I have to wonder of the differences  are detectable by human
> operators? Is there a situation in which the O II operator will throw
> up their hands, while the K3 operator never looks up? Or, will both
> rigs simply be deemed "excellent," and the differences in operator
> preferences be driven by ergonomics?
>
> Kim Elmore, N5OP
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>