TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc
From: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 07:29:52 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I definitely agree with that Ron .  The cheeseie phonetics makes it tough on 
English speaking hams how about forgin hams trying to keep up in a forgin 
language .  John kb2huk
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Subject: Abbreviations used by amateurs.doc


> Gang,
>
> One thing I gathered from all these e-mails on the subject is:
>
> It's subjective.
>
> We should follow a set standard list (like Q-code) and adhere to it.
>
> This is like them phone ops making up their own phonetics of their call,
> it's cool, but confusing to others especially during difficult band
> conditions.
>
> R R R (smile)
>
> Ron, wb1hga
> "the 516 is still a keeper"
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>