TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] FW: [orion565] Digest Number 853

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] FW: [orion565] Digest Number 853
From: "Reg Unsworth" <reg.unsworth@btopenworld.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:27:17 +0100
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
You miss the point.  I could have paid a lot less ofr stuff to break (or not 
in the case of 2 of my rigs).  Seems to me you're suggesting I shouldn't 
feel too bad at being shot when I could have been hanged ....

Methinks your glass is half full Grant whereas mine is maybe half empty ;>)

73

Reg


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] FW: [orion565] Digest Number 853


>
>> If a potential purchaser asked me for my opinion I think I
>> would have to say
>> honestly that in my experience, it's performance (especially
>> receive) is
>> great  but let down by its reliability
>
> I guess you would have to consider yourself lucky that you didn't have one
> of the $12000 radios that had a bad patch of blowing finals, or one of the
> prvious generation of $5000 radios that burned up power supplies
> periodically and on which (power supply compartment) one could poach an 
> egg
> :-)
>
> Stuff breaks.  We need to get over it.
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>