TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 56, Issue 11

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 56, Issue 11
From: Larry DiGioia <o2@longwire.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:33:00 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Now you've done it. Don't let Kurt hear you say that.

Interestingly, he just addressed a similar issue in his last column.

I am a user of random length dipoles and truly balanced tuners. I am 8 
countries away from 5BDXCC with that (OK, I have a Hy-Tower too,) and 
100W. Anyway, I used to fight tuning the wires, lengthening and 
shortening them, because I believed that the more turns of inductance 
and the more meshed the capacitors were, the more I was "losing in the 
tuner."

Not true. See the last issue of "Worldradio" for an explanation.

CATFISHTWO@aol.com wrote:
> but when you use a  
> random dipole and a tuner, you are leaving some of your power in the tuner, 
-- 
Larry  N8KU

 l o n g w i r e . c o m
 HF - DX - CW - Digital

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>