To: | <w7ts@comcast.net>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] re Oh? |
From: | Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:21:04 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Some things just need to die a slow death. KC4ATU > From: w7ts@comcast.net> To: tentec@contesting.com> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 > 21:52:05 -0600> Subject: Re: [TenTec] re Oh?> > This thread is starting to > wear thin, but am guessing that it is too much to ask> to move it to the > price patrol reflector.> ;<)> 73,> Ken W7TS> > > _______________________________________________> TenTec mailing list> > TenTec@contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _________________________________________________________________ See what you’re getting into…before you go there http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_preview_0507 _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Amplifiers or system efficiency., Stuart Rohre |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] triton 540 reversed polarity, Louis A. Ciotti Jr. |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] re Oh?, Bob McGraw - K4TAX |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Fw: The ARRL Letter, Vol 26, No 31 (Friday, August 3, 2007), JAMES HANLON |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |