To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Omni VII |
From: | John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:58:52 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I'm intrigued by the lack of comments on the July QST review of the OMNI VII. It's a very good radio, if a bit pricey, for everyday ham use, and I would have thought there would be discussion of the review and lab results. Not so. Is it because the radio has no appeal to participants in this list? Can it be that the radio's major appeal is to computer-bound folks who want to operate remotely? That's certainly the theme of Ten-Tec's advertising, at least. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Lightning Strike Results..., Paul Gates, KD3JF |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni VII, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Lightning Strike Results..., ac9s |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni VII, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |