To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now? |
From: | Martin AA6E <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:53:43 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
www.eQSL.cc works along those lines. The downside is that such "cards" do not count toward DXCC or other wallpaper. 73 Martin AA6E dw wrote: > I know this is off the topic of equipment, but. > It would seem to make sense that you could web-search a ham's email > address, > pretty much world-wide now, in order to email rather than snail-mail a > QSL. > > Is there a free online service working in this fashion? > > Thanks > Duane > N1BBR _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, dw |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Whats a good way to monitor your cw signal?, dw |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, dw |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for QSLing now?, dw |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |