TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Class A

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A
From: "n4dsp" <n4dsp@triad.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:13:58 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Dennis,
we all know what the original poster, Grant, meant!

john-n4dsp


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dennis OConnor" <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 8:47 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Class A


> In my worthless opinion, keyboard CW isn't "CW".  It may sound like CW, it
> may meet the international definition of CW as an emission type, but it's
> nothing more than some schmuck typing on a keyboard.
> *******************************************************************
>
>  Hmm, so how is he reading the CW - computer or ears?
>  This could open a whole new can of worms... If keyboard generated CW 
> isn't real CW, then is keyer paddle CW real CW?  Or is only CW generated 
> by my pounding on a straight key CW?
>  And if only brass pounding is real CW, then maybe only sparks flying off 
> the key from a rotary spark gap is the only "real" CW... <cept spark is 
> not continuous wave, hmmmm>  Questions, questions...

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>