TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Code and everything else

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Code and everything else
From: John R <W3ULS@3n.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:14:09 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
My two cents:

1.  On this one, ARRL did all it could. Joel Hallas' post pretty much  
says it all.

2.  I'm glad W8JI was successful well before now in his quest for  
manufacturers to clean up their key clicks. From here on out, I do  
not see any incentive for manufacturers to care one way or the other  
about the CW envelopes their transceivers will be producing, QSK or  
whatever. But now we have Yaesu, Ten-Tec and Icom with first-class  
rigs that do not mess up the spectrum and pretty good QSK. We owe  
W8JI a vote of thanks for what he's accomplished.

3.  K4IA noted on eHam.net that if Technicians want to enjoy the new  
spectrum privileges they have on the HF bands, they will have to use  
CW. If they want to use phone, they'll have to upgrade to General. So  
there is a built-in incentive in the FCC's regs for continued use of  
CW by newcomers. I like that.

On another subject, the FCC has carved out a 15 kc segment of the 80  
meter CW band just below 3600 for all this Pactor/WinLink stuff.  
Seems a good place to put those stations which otherwise could cause  
problems.

Finally, it looks to me that Bill Cross of the FCC is looking forward  
to retirement. He has taken all of the tough issues and dealt with  
them. He will leave quite an impressive legacy, IMHO. I know I'd be  
ready to go after this latest burst of activity.

73,
John, W3ULS
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>