To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews |
From: | ron <roncasa@verizon.net> |
Reply-to: | roncasa@verizon.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:11:21 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
he did not know how to experience "Oprion" ..... Ron, wb1hga Grant Youngman wrote: > But for the first time in a long time I bothered to read through the > comments overall. Interesting points of view. One guy even thought his > Swan 500 was a better radio. Also his Signal One (didn't say WHICH one), > was "1000 time [sic] better". He didn't say what that "1000 time" factor > referred to, but I do hope he's enjoying that Swan :-) > > Sometimes you just have to shake your head .... _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Kc9cdt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Ron Castro |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Grant Youngman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] eHam Reviews, Ron Castro |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |