TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...."

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...."
From: Martin Ewing <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:47:28 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 07:30:14AM -0500, GARY HUBER wrote:
>   
>> Regarding "highly technical programming such as an ORION II"; after spending 
>> twenty years in R&D of Telecom and RF applications, I agree... it takes lots 
>> of money for  highly competent programmer teams to get working a product 
>> with minimal bugs out of the lab and into the market. See 
>> http://www.csm-gh.com/projects.htm for examples of beta tests and 
>> "controlled introductions" with communications industry R&D teams. Seemingly 
>> no new software product is without bugs or runs as expected outside the R&D 
>> lab.
>>     
>
> The usual metric for programing complex systems is TWO testers per programmer.
> Sytems that require 99.999% (the infamous five nines) reliability) often
> need THREE to FOUR.
>
> Geoff.
>   
Well, TenTec has a thousand testers.  Problem is, we're not on the payroll.
:-)
de aa6e
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>