To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 2.033 |
From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 3 May 2006 15:47:50 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> Has nothing whatsoever to do with a bandwidth limiting > filter. That, of course, is another approach, which works to > a certain degree also. But not what a real DSP noise reducer does. The are many ways to skin the proverbial cat. Isn't the net effect of passing highly correlated signals (cross-correlated with a signal of known frequency or auto-correlated) and rejecting relatively uncorrelated signals (noise) a very narrow filter centered at the frequency of the highly correlated signal (or signals). Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 2.033, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] K3NA article URL (corrected), Ken - N9VV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 2.033, Gary Hoffman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 2.033, Sinisa Hristov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |