It would help if people that report measured data do
so with measures of central tendency. Sample size,
mean and standard deviation. Then one could easily
see where a specific set of measurements fall in the
grand scheme.
50 measurements on the O2 versus 50 measurements on
the O1 would either solidify or prevent Grant's
observation. One datum leaves us all floating in the
breeze.
73,
John NA9U
--- Larry Menzel <retire@means.net> wrote:
> Com'on, Grant...a "bit worse"...that's pretty harsh.
>
> How about "slightly less" or "not quite as good" or
> "only minutely lower".
>
>
> It's still head and shoulders over the nearest
> modern competitor. Let's
> rejoice in the major victory.
>
> Larry, N0XB ;-)
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Grant Youngman
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 9:43 AM
> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] (no subject)
>
>
> > Bob has added the Orion II data to the dynamic
> range table on
> > his site as well other rigs and some corrections.
>
> Interesting that BDR, LO Phase Noise and and MDS are
> a bit worse than the v1
> Orion. Could be just his sample (?). But perhaps
> not.
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.1.384 / Virus Database: 268.4.2/314 -
> Release Date: 4/16/2006
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|