| To: | <geraldj@storm.weather.net>,"'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Orion V1 vs. V2 Audio |
| From: | "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:23:06 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> The V2 low cutoff is reasonable, the high cutoff is too high. > Though I suppose the complaint is that the low cutoff was set > for 50 but got 300... Maybe TT did that to protect the PA > from those useless power peaks. Seems to me perhaps QRZ.com or eham might be a more appropriate place for bandwidth wars. We're talking here about performance, not whether anyone happens to think we all ought to talk through a straw, so we can all sound equally horrendous. Sheesh ... Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Orion "Bugs," etc., John Rippey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RF in headphone cables, w3ww |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion V1 vs. V2 Audio, Ralph Matheny |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] RF in headphone cables, John Nason / NA9U |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |