TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] The Bug

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Bug
From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Reply-to: geraldj@storm.weather.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 09:17:16 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 18:27 -1000, Ken Brown wrote:
> No reason you cannot use a good stable Ten-Tec transceiver in CW mode as 
> a VFO to have some degree of frequency agility. You're going to have to 
> work on the tank circuit a bit to get it to 160 or 75 meters anyway, so 
> why not make it tunable.
> 
> I'm thinking an RCA BT1K. Push Pull 833s modulated by Push Pull 833s. 
> It's only a kW. Since it is a 50s vintage TX, 50's vintage ham power 
> limits should be appropriate way to maintain purity and stability to a 
> level the state of the art permits. And it will fit in a one car garage.
> 
> DE N6KB
> 
Gates and Collins all made a pair of 833s modulated by a pair of 833s.
More likely paralleled in the PA.

50's vintage ham limit were PA plate input power ignoring the peaks from
modulation. A pair off 833s ought to run 1800 watts PA input to get 1 KW
RF carrier with a peak power output of 2 KW. Today with the peak power
output limited to 1.5 KW, its still not legal. I'm sure it can be backed
off a bit though that wasn't type approved. It would be easier to back
off the power of a tetrode or pentode PA by lowering the PA screen
voltage.

These rigs are all tunable from outside the box, probably hidden behind
a door.

-- 
73, Jerry, K0CQ,
All content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>