True, but I also have been loud at the other end and pulled my share of low
sigs out of the mud here.
mike
k5wmg
one watt all the time
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Reg Unsworth" <reg.unsworth@btopenworld.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:12:29 -0000
>variables? - especially the ops at the other end ;>)
>
>73
>
>Reg
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "mgoins" <mgoins@mail.ev1.net>
>To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
>Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:10 PM
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good?
>
>
>>
>> >I agree that using a shack-end tuner, through coax, to an non-resonant
>> >antenna is a pretty inefficient way to do things. It's one of the best
>ways I know
>> >to attenuate a 100 watt transmitter output to about 5 Watts, ERP.
>> >
>>
>> ----------and I've worked all over the world through a tuner with one
>watt, cw, ssb, and psk. All depends on a lot of variables. This is not a
>simple "this works- this won't" discussion.
>>
>> mike
>> k5wmg
>> one watt all the time
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|