To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] re Omni VI |
From: | "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:34:15 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
See Dave Hammond's post of 11 Sep. 2002 in the Ten Tec archive at http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00277.html Its subject is Re: Confusion About the 563 and 564. rob / k5uj _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good?, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good?, Roger Borowski |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Paragon Phase Noise problem, Bill Tippett |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Rog K9RB Antenna Tuners, Bruce Lanning |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |