TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] O2 keyer

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] O2 keyer
From: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:47:38 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
George,
I have not had a problem using the internal keyer with my ORION II.  The
radio has been nearly bullet proof, in my use of it, with few and minor
exceptions.
Ron KA7U

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of George Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:49 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] O2 keyer


George,

  Please tell me more about the internal keyer problem.  Could this be RF
getting into your keying line?  I am getting ready to purchase an O2 and in
internal keyer is a big issue.  I have had a Corsair 2 for 18 years and the
keyer was excellent and never failed once.  Am I going to have to go by an
external keyer now?  That shoots up  the cost all the more.  I am bordering
on going back to the Yaesu FT 1000 MP if I have to keep buying extras to
make an EXPENSIVE radio work right.


73,


George K9WWT



George K <w2yj@highstream.net> wrote:   I got to agree with the post about
the O2 keyer. For that mater, the O that
I owned as well.
Sometimes I think I can't send CW because of the extraneous dits or dahs it
inserts. Still may be me but this keyer is hard for me to use.
It seems that the ratio isn't correct but it still may be me???
George


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>