| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message) |
| From: | Philip Leonard WVØT <leolists@seidkr.com> |
| Reply-to: | leolists@seidkr.com,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:46:00 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Ron Zond wrote: > 960 exceeds V by CMLV. Quintius Flavius > Minimus told me I was his star pupil in math (Roman) back in 150 AD. Oh, for > the good old days. Don't you mean CL AD? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] (no subject), We5f |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Heaqdphone Redux, Ken Waites |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message), Ron Zond |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Headphone Redux, Lee A Crocker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |