Hi Bob,
Most of the classified RADAR technology of the era has become obsolete and
downgraded. For the most part all the old analog designs are pretty much
generally available to the public or can be had under the Freedom of
Information Act.
I was under non-disclosure for twenty-five years.... and that expired more than
ten years ago.
Best regards,
Gary - AB9M
CSM(r)G.L.Huber
glhuber@msn.com<mailto:glhuber@msn.com>
gary.huber@us.army.mil<mailto:gary.huber@us.army.mil>
www.csm-gh.com<http://www.csm-gh.com/>
9679 Heron Bay Road
Bloomington, IL 61704
(309-662-0604)
National Webmaster for:
The Society of the Fifth Division
wm@fifthinfantrydivision.com<mailto:wm@fifthinfantrydivision.com>
www.societyofthefifthdivision.com<http://www.societyofthefifthdivision.com/>
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX<mailto:RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
I worked for GE and worked on the GE system that did this. That's all I can
or will say about it.
73
Bob, K4TAX
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com<mailto:dufferjames@hotmail.com>>
To: <tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
> The Soviets were not the only ones using OTHR that utilized HF (some in
> ham
> bands). GE did testing that encroached on the ham bands (at times). I am
> saying that as I saw documentation that indicated this. I have not
> personally heard any interference that I could positively say was OTHR in
> the last 15 years.
>
> de wd4air
>
>
>>From: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net<mailto:k8vt@ameritech.net>>
>>Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
<tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>>
>>To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
<tentec@contesting.com<mailto:tentec@contesting.com>>
>>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
>>Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:05:38 -0500
>>
>>GARY HUBER wrote:
>>
>> >When the Soviets were running OTHR in the amateur bands, (which used the
>>HF echo to "see" targets) I used QSK CW dits to synchronize with their
>>OTHR
>>pulse timing and jam their "B" scopes. As a former Radar Electronics
>>Counter-Measures and Electronics Counter-Counter-Measures operator, I knew
>>it was simply a matter of transmitting a signal of about the same
>>frequency, duration, and slightly stronger than their "return" to confuse
>>their operators.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>I guess we should all be thankful that they didn't confuse your Omni D
>>for a swarm of U.S. ICBMs coming over the horizon... ;-)
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>TenTec mailing list
>>TenTec@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|