TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ORIONII_INTERNAL_AT_TUNER--re:4:1 balun....hmmmmmmmm....

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ORIONII_INTERNAL_AT_TUNER--re:4:1 balun....hmmmmmmmm....
From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 05:49:40 -0800
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I disagree !

Here is what you really want:

http://www.hamware.de/hardware/tuner415/at415-e.htm 

Advantages:
- similar tuning range
- memories for fast band change
- coax (matched to 50 Ohms) into the shack
- smaller form-factor on the table

And by the way, that article by World Radio was full of truths as well as
garbage.  It is totally wrong (as Bob pointed out) to assume that your
antenna will usually have a high impedance.  

73
Rick


-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Larry DiGioia
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:31 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ORIONII_INTERNAL_AT_TUNER--re:4:1
balun....hmmmmmmmm....

CROCDONZ1@aol.com wrote:

>as told in world radio......
> 
>With such a 
>variation in impedance at the  transmitter end of the line there is no one
balun 
>transformer that will  match it. Most of the time the impedance will be
above 
>the 50 Ohms of your coax  so a high impedance balun would be desirable.  
>Unfortunately high  imped&shy;ance baluns don't work well when not matched.
>
Here is what you really want:

http://www.palstar.com/bt1500a.php


-- 
Larry  N8KU

 w w w . l o n g w i r e . c o m
    100% CW     100% HF

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>