To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] CQWW CW contest (k3hx@juno.com) |
From: | john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:14:28 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
>I don't use machines to copy code so somebody blazing away at 40+ wpm calling >CQ gets ignored. I don't think there's many/any folks using machine copy during a contest...they just dont work as well as the machine between our ears, particularly in a high QRM environment. If there's ever a time to evaluate one's favorite Tentec rig on adjacent freq strong signal rejection, CW CQWWDX is it...particularly on 40m at night! :-) John K5MO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 35, Issue 61, leonard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 35, Issue 62, Malcolm McLeman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 35, Issue 61, leonard |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 35, Issue 62, Malcolm McLeman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |