TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW!

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW!
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:03:47 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I guess we've all had horrible experiences like that, and wish we could
crawl under the earth and hide.

My feelings regarding the whole deal are these:

Let's not be critical of anyone except yourself personally.  Set you own
goals high.  Improve your fist.  Improve your operating skills.  Improve
your stations.

Let the other guy worry about his own deficiencies.

Be positive.  Be helpful.  Get more people in the hobby.

Leave scrooge for the cartoons.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Chambley, Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW!


> Y'know, that reminds me of the time I criticized the other operator's fist
> and then found out that he was a paraplegic, using a soda straw in his
teeth
> to operate the J-38.
>
> I told him I had to sign out and look for a place to hide.
>
> Phil
>
>
> VFO Stabilizers and PEP adapters for wattmeters...Check out
> http://home.comcast.net/~k4dpk
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <n4nt_m_o_hyder@charter.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 9:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW!
>
>
> > Right.  How dare that OT with arthritis get on the air to talk with his
> > friends.  How dare that lady who had a stroke get on the air at all.
> Their
> > CW isn't acceptable to you, the judge of the airwaves.  They have no
> right.
> >
> > 73, Mike N4NT
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>
> > To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW!
> >
> >
> > I've heard that!
> > CQ's sound like C T T A's
> > ...Dave
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
> > To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW!
> >
> >
> > > Oh man, don't get me started.  I was copying someone a few nights ago
> > > who had such a "swing" to their bug sending that it could not be
copied,
> > > except by the station he was working.  The swingster was working
someone
> > > using a keyer.  The difference between the two was like night and day
> > > with the latter sounding like well formed CW and the former being a
> > > string of very long dahs and super short dits.  Add some creative
> > > spacing between elements, chars and words and the signal was reduced
> > > from morse code to random intermittent-CW.
> > >
> > > --...  ...--
> > >
> > > Or by bug I get
> > >
> > > --  ----  .. . ..  . --  -----
> > >
> > > You be the judge :-)
> > >
> > > (OK, for those who are a bit humor challenged, the above post is only
> > > half serious.  As it proceeds it transitions from fairly serious (on
an
> > > admittedly non-serious topic) to rather tongue-in-cheek.  I apologize
> > > now for the offense I'm nearly sure this will cause ...)
> > >
> > > - Keith KD1E -
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>