TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000
From: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Reply-to: Steve Baron - KB3MM <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:17:48 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 00:14
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000


> If Open Source software will put SDR vendors out of business, how do you
> explain the success of RedHat, SUSE and others that are benefiting from
the
> Open Source movement started by Linux?

I think it really appeals to Bill Bashers and those who have to do it their
way.

>
> Dave
> K5WNV
> (an independent (for profit) software developer   :>)
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 5:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000
>
>
> >
> >> SDR-1000 is a big plus with few negatives.  You get faster
> >> development (more man-hours of development and test), faster
> >> bugfixes, and lots of creative exchange among users &
> >> programmers all for minimum cost to the manufacturer.  TT and
> >> other vendors, take note!
> >
> > By definition, the "value" of an SDR is going to be in the software, and
> > not
> > in the diminishing number of hardware bits that front-end it.  Software,
> > as
> > protected Intellectual Property (IP), is where the value is.  I agree
that
> > there's value in open source.  It's a place for experimentation and
> > innovation.  Ultimately, it's value-less if it's free, and that puts SDR
> > vendors out of business unless the open source eventually becomes closed
> > and
> > proprietary, and therefore has value as IP.
> >
> > Flex is using open source (read that as free volunteer written software)
> > to
> > add value to their hardware modules.  You get half a radio at something
> > more
> > than half the price, and for now the entire back-end part of the radio
is
> > a
> > PC, soundcard, and free software.  As Flex's "half" shrinks where are
they
> > going to make a dime?  The user community isn't suddenly going to be
happy
> > about having to shell out several $000 for the FlexPRO software release,
> > but
> > if that doesn't happen, the Flex will forever be a tinkerer's radio,
even
> > if
> > an interesting and fun one  ....
> >
> > Grant/NQ5T
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>