| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] cw filters in omni |
| From: | "Dave Bowker" <dbowker@mail.sjv.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:58:42 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
|
Hi Clark, Just to add some credible data to the discussion I have attached data from three measurements I made on Inrad and TT filters. The newer TT filters seem to be quite comparable to the Inrad in the "loss department"! Granted, the #753 is a bit narrower (400 Hz), but the loss is comparable to the earlier TT #217 filters and more than the current TT #217 filters (2004 vintage I tested) 73, Dave, K1FK Fort Kent., ME ARRL Life Member _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] CW Filters for Omni D, Douglas G. Bonett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Good Surge Supressor, Denton |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] CW Filters for Omni D, Douglas G. Bonett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Good Surge Suppressor, Jim Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |