To: | <adam2@n4ekv.com>,"Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy |
From: | "John T. Gwin" <jtgwin@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:04:44 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
From my observations, eHam routinely deletes negative reviews without notice, particularly, it seems, when they concern eHam advertisers (or perhaps when those advertisers complain). On the other hand, I notice that there are still multiple Jupiter reviews with hugely negative remarks, and ratings from zero on up. These are still there. If the conspiracy theory is valid, I would expect these to have been removed, too. -W4SK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy, Adam N. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy, W4ABW |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy, Adam N. |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy, Mike Bryce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |