Martin Ewing wrote:
> I sympathize with the wish to share. On the other hand, it's a
> copyrighted and restricted article. I wonder where the line on "fair
> use" is drawn in Newington. Sending someone a copy is much less an
> issue than posting it on your website for the world, but a lawyer
> might not agree.
>
> 73, Martin AA6E
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:22:40 -0500, Ed <w3nr@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>Larry Keith wrote:
>>
>>>It's a pity that he just didn't ask for a copy of the article.. Someone
>>>might have downloaded it and e-mailed it to him.
>>
>>Already on the way to him. I always thought that part of being a ham was
>>to share information. Any others needing a copy please feel free to ask,
>>I'll gladly send you a copy via email.
>>
>>73
>>
>>Ed W3NR
As my beloved Grandpa would have said " I don't give a rats patooey".
Its a product review article, not the plans for an atomic bomb. I'll bet
TT even has a downloaded reprint floating around.
Ed W3NR
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.0 - Release Date: 3/21/2005
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|