| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? |
| From: | <al_lorona@agilent.com> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:39:40 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Why would you automatically assume that? Al W6LX > We all want to hear these replies Doc. Since they weren't > made public we > automatically assume they were negative. > > Steve Ellington > N4LQ@iglou.com _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 26, Issue 38, Garyenj |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam?, Stuart Rohre |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam?, W.D. (Doc) Lindsey |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam?, Stuart Rohre |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |