To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] CW copy speed record holder |
From: | "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:37:45 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
No. It probably means he can copy normal conversational code faster
than that!! RUFZ is extremely difficult to copy in that all that is
sent is random international call signs. That is almost, but not
quite equivalent to word groups. Either one is a heck of a lot more
difficult to copy than normal conversation. Tom - W4BQF ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allen Smith" <moses@frontier.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:00 PM Subject: [TenTec] CW copy speed record holder Jim/NN6EE asked who has beaten a previously held record of 72.5 and Stuart/K5KVH answered that Chuck Adams/K7QO possibly was current holder at about 75 wpm. Chuck may be even faster than that. Here is his signature line from a QRP-L post: "Chuck Adams, K7QO CP-60 and RUFZ 109WPM" Does this mean he can copy 109 wpm? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] CW copy speed record holder, ron |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] CW copy speed record holder, ultrafixedwing@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] CW copy speed record holder, NJ0IP |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] CW copy speed record holder, ultrafixedwing@juno.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |