TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux!

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux!
From: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:07:54 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Background noise? Cheeesh...What's that supposed to be?
Is that like the xyl or something?

Steve N4LQ
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sinisa Hristov" <shristov@ptt.yu>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 1:42 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux!



Steve N4LQ wrote:

Yes you are correct. For noisy conditions you want a very fast decay


Yes and no, depends on noise.

For the "background" type of noise
use hand time > 0 and slow decay.

For strong impulse noise and strong atmospheric crashes
using zero hang time and fast decay in order clips pulses.


73,


Sinisa  YT1NT, VE3EA
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>