As the Omni-VI Plus 'cascades' (which is really a cool thing when you
consider you get up to 16-poles of filtering at 9 MHz) the N-1 or N-2
filter behind the default 2.4 kHz 9 MHz filter putting the INRAD filters
in the N-1 or N-2 position, instead of exchanging them with the 2.4 kHz
filters will NOT give you greater receive bandwidth as you are still
limited to the primary Ten-Tec 2.4 kHz roofing filter. Of course you do
skate around the whole balanced carrier adjustment thing, but I still
don't get it.
Jerald, KG6TT
n4lq wrote:
I'm curious why you would put the 2.8khz filter in the N2 slot? I assume
you wanted to retain the stock 2.4khz transmit bandwidth while receiving
at 2.8khz? Am I on track?
N4LQ
-----Original Message-----
From: CROCDONZ1@aol.com
To: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:03:20 EST
Subject: Re: [TenTec] WTB: Omni 6+ (564)
hi
i have one, its a nice rig, no issues at all, cosmetics are superb,
face is
superb, all the filter slots on boith if's are full. in the 250 cw slot
and in
the n2 slot i have 2.8 inrad filters installed, i JUST put them in. its
makes
it a superb ssb rig! manual, power cord, and a 705 mic, (i have the
inrad ssb
mod, uninstalled, i will send that along as well) if you are interested
i can
send some pics, price is $1650 shipped and insured to your door.
don-kd9mf
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|