Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity

["denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>]

Wonder how an Omni VI compares to a Corasir II in similar circumstances? 
thanks de Denton WB7TDG
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "WF2U" <wf2u@starband.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity


> I recently got rid of an Icom 756 in favor of the Omni VI Opt.3.
> Side-by-side comparison showed that the Omni VI has a definite edge in
> weak-signal reception. The difference may be attributable to lower phase
> noise in the Omni VI. The 756 DSP wasn't up to snuff clarifying mushy, 
> noisy
> signals. The Omni VI DSP seems to work better. The IC-756 could never hear
> weak signals in the "holes" in between strong stations, where the Omni VI
> picks up some nice activity.
>
> The PBT is different - in the Omni VI you can lose the station if you 
> don't
> retune the frequency when the station gets out of the passband. In the 
> Icom
> radios (I also had an Icom 740) passband tuning doesn't shift the center
> frequency.
>
> In fact, my Omni-C beats the IC-756 in weak-signal work, except the lack 
> of
> PBT makes it harder to dig out weak signals in between strong stations.
>
> 73, Meir WF2U
> Landrum, SC
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
> > [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of DennisKT5D@aol.com
> > Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 5:19 AM
> > To: tentec@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity
> >
> >
> >    I had an Icom-765 for awhile which sported a very good
> > receiver comlete
> > with all the filters for cw work. It had the PBT and IF shift
> > mods done as well.
> > I sat it down beside the Omni 6+ and did some testing. Ambient
> > noise level on
> > both was almost identical with perhaps the edge to the 765. At
> > the time the
> > 765 was matching up with some plans I had for reconfiguring the
> > shack so I was
> > about to decide to sell the Omni 6+. Then the CQ WW CW DX contest
> > came along.
> > After A/B comparison during the contest, I abruptly changed my mind about
> > reconfiguring the shack and selling the Omni.
> >    What I discovered was this. I could tune between two strong US
> > stations a
> > couple of kHz's apart with the Omni and copy a weak DX station, 3 to 4
> > s-units, easily.  Switching to the 765, I absolutely could not
> > hear the weak DX
> > station. All I heard was an elevated noise floor due to the close
> > in strong US
> > stations. Clearly, to my ears the Omni is the superior contest
> > rig of the two. The
> > 765 could hear as well as the Omni in non-contest conditions so
> > sensitivity
> > was not an issue. Both radios exhibited the high pitched hiss on
> > white noise
> > but again, the 765 wasn't quite as bad as the Omni. The
> > selectivity was what
> > really separated the two radios in contest performance.
> >    If your radio doesn't seem to be as sensitivity as it should
> > be perhaps
> > there is a problem with it. The Omni's reputation is well earned
> > here and the
> > 765 is gone.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec