To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is |
From: | "Mike N9IVO" <n9ivo@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:47:55 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I always considered full-break-in (full qsk) to be where I can hear between all sent characters, more to make sure no doubling with the station is taking place than anything else, as this will cause much confusion. It also lets one avoid sending while a dx station is sending and not listening. It also lets a station to interrupt the other station's sending if needed, like mentioned already in this thread. I never understood the term: semi-break-in. Either you can break in or not. There IS no semi-break-in!!#&$&%&%* Slow qsk is a much more accurate term. Mike N9IVO
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] N4PY Orion Control, Ron Hinton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TXCO unit, Ken Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is, Dave Edwards |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is, Duane A Calvin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |