To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re Please tell me about the TT Omni VI+ |
From: | "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:26:44 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
If I remember correctly, the original post was about DXing and contesting,
90% of the time on SSB. Not hi-fi receive audio or rig features. None of the receivers listed below will top the Omni-VI/VI Plus for receiver performance. There is plenty of independent test data out in circulation to back up that statement. "Prone to RF in the audio" - That's certainly not something we hear discussed often as a service issue with the Omni-VI's. I remember you posting a message about having a problem with RF in the audio on an Omni-VI at high power while using (as described by you) an inadequate ground system. You mentioned in that message: "I've since talked to a few other omni owners with the same problem and therefore think this is going on in a number of QTHs and it all has to do with the installation." - if you're having an RF issue, I can see that. Every amateur installation is unique. http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/tentec/2003-May/034353.html This weekend, you could have bought an Omni-VI at our hamfest for $999 or an upgraded VI to VI+ for $1099. Now *that* was a very good deal. Good enough that all of the Omni-VI Plus and option 3 upgraded radios we had on hand were sold - and if you were here this weekend, you saw the pile (literally, 3 feet high by 12 feet long) of used Omni's we had available. All gone. Every last one of them. And I agree - if you want hi-fi SSB audio, don't bother with an Omni-VI. It was designed as a high-performance, communications-grade amateur transceiver. ---------------------------------------- Just out of curiousity, I typed OMNI VI SSB AUDIO and OMNI VI+ SSB AUDIO into Google as N4LQ suggested and wasn't able to find anything about poor audio quality. Try it yourself. What I did come across were items like this from N1EU on the reflector in 2002: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00098.html The Inrad 2.8Khz filters are really a necessity to complete the "mod". The Triton, on the other hand, benefits from stock 2.7Khz wide filters. For the Omni VI, I'm confident that the combination of tapping the audio off the product detector plus the wide Inrad filters would result in excellent hi-fi quality ssb rx audio. The Omni's stock 2.4Khz filters just aren't wide enough to pass enough bass to give the male voice some body and enough treble to prevent the voice from sounding muffled, at the same time. I'm speaking, of course, about "hi-fi" audio - for communications quality audio, the 2.4Khz filters are perfect 73, Barry N1EU ------------------------------- Sounds about right to me. 73 Scott Robbins W4PA At 03:12 PM 9/29/04 +0000, you wrote: >>In this price range I would definitely consider a used TS850, which is an excellent dx and contest rig, has a better display and in >>my opinion better build quality (the Omni seems to be prone to RF in the audio problems). >>For not much more (a few hundred dollars) you can get a used FT1000 which is an excellent analog dx and contest rig on SSB, >>and for about $1800 you can get a new FT1000MP Mk V field with newer DSP technology and many other features the Omni >>does not have. >>As a sidebar, if you want hifi audio quality, forget the Omni totally. All the mods in the world won't get past the relatively narrow rx bandwidth its analog technology confines it to. Get a used TS870. 73, Rob/K5UJ ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ten-Tec, Inc., 1185 Dolly Parton Pkwy, Sevierville, TN 37862 USA Contact Mon-Fri Eastern: Office/Tech (865) 453-7172 9 am-5 pm. Repair (865) 428-0364 8-4. Sales (800) 833-7373 9 am-5:30 pm. Fax (865) 428-4483 24 hrs. Visit us at <http://www.tentec.com> Email: New product sales/product info sales@tentec.com Service department service@tentec.com While we make every effort to answer email in an expedient manner, the telephone is a much more efficient tool for getting a quicker and more complete answer to your inquiries. Thanks!
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] New from Ten-Tec: Model 3003 Acro-Bat, Eric SENSI |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Why N1MM does not support the Tentec file interface, Lee Crocker |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Re Please tell me about the TT Omni VI+, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re Please tell me about the TT Omni VI+, n4lq |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |