To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector |
From: | "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:04:01 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
"For me, the hardware changes mean nothing. Its the receiver that counts" Now there's a good one. Let's see.....I explain how the changes to the ICOM Pro line are not software changes and am blamed for "bashing TenTec"! Then I'm told that receivers are not hardware. Well let me say this about software. You could have a very good radio with NO software but a radio that was ALL software wouldn't work AT ALL. So if I am "bashing" something, it is software. Software reduces us to something even worse than appliance operators. It turns us in to helpless sucklings, always looking to mama programmer for more firmware milk. It appears that SOME of our rigs are having problems being weaned, yea even what is claimed to be the "Highest Performance, Optimized" transceiver is still crying for mama. "Mama mama, my QSK is clicking and my screen is brown" Ohhhh mama, I am loosing my audio and my output is down. Pleassssseeee mama help me before I lock up and totally shut down!" Steve N4LQ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 6:11 AM Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector, Bill Rowlett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector, David W LeJeune, Sr |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector, Bill Rowlett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector, David W LeJeune, Sr |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |