To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Software Testing |
From: | Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:10:27 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi, Although software testing, Quality Assurance that is, has come a long in recent years, there is no substitute for an independent QA department that does it's own testing, using it's own software developed independently of the developers and free from management and other influence. Although the developers are or should be required to do their own testing before releasing the product, the same mentality that put the bug may possibly overlook it if he develops the test software. Sorta like the fox watching the hen house. Chas, 20 years experience as QA software tester. At 08:30 AM 9/20/2004, you wrote: > Has the art of software testing made any progress > since Dijkstra's conjecture (almost 40 years ago) > that it can only prove the presence of errors, > but not their absence? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Corsair for Sale, Ed Warhover |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] rcvr/no audio, skip |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Software Testing, Mark Erbaugh |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Software Testing, Tom Badgett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |