To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition |
From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:24:10 -1000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Bob, Okay, fine. I first experienced QSK with a Kenwood TS-440SAT. It was pretty good. I got spoiled and could not go back to slower "semi-breakin". I heard that Ten Tec had really good QSK, so I bought a used Omni VI. I think it is fantastic. Now I would not be satisfied with anything with QSK slower than what my Omni VI has. I see a lot of postings here that say the Orion's QSK is less than satisfactory. But then, I see some that say the Omni VI is no good too. So I take it all with a grain of salt. ... Anyway, I like to use QSK and I like the way it works in my Omni VI. 73 DE N6KB Bob Henderson wrote: Ken _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK, Michael Tope |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition, Bob Henderson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition, Bob Henderson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition, Bob Henderson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |