To: | "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here? |
From: | "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>,tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:09:41 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:53:23 -0700, NJ0IP wrote: >The 7800 review in RadCom came >out just a few days ago so it's currently a hot toppic. I repeat the question -- why is this being discussed at such great on the TenTec list? Isn't this list devoted to the operation, use, and maintenance of TenTec gear? Is it because some of our members are more intereted in "cheerleading" or taking sides in a "mine is better than yours" (or "mine is bigger than yours") playground fight? Jim Brown K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] INRAD Filters for Sale, Lee Patton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here?, Bob Henderson |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here?, NJ0IP |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here?, Don Watters |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |