| To: | 'Ken Brown' <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>, tentec@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [TenTec] omni v short dits | 
| From: | Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca> | 
| Reply-to: | farson@shaw.ca, tentec@contesting.com | 
| Date: | Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:52:24 -0700 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> | 
| Hi Ken, Precisely. The reason for my original post was that I felt a need to qualify "works better" a little more closely. The original statement that "there isn't any such thing" as a digital mode which works better than high-speed Morse was far too general and unspecific. >From my own perspective, I rarely operate CW any longer (and when I do, I use a straight key at about 15 wpm.) Almost all my HF amateur operating is SSB. Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] to much e-mail!!! Please remove me from the list!!!, edward chiarini | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] omni v short dits, Adam Farson | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits, Ken Brown | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits, Tommy | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |