TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published
From: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:31:36 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
    Why don't you suggest that option to them?  Nothing says that they can't
have a DSP/CPU upgrade from time to time.

            73,


            Bernard, WA4OEJ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <N0KHQ@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 1:36 PM
Subject: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published


> I personally hope that the IC-7800 performs well for its intended use and
> audience.
>
> The only thing that bothers me, is what Icom did to the IC-756 following.
> (IC-756, 756Pro and then the 756Proll) You would think that Icom users
would have
> learned their lesson the first time around. Here we go again!
> For this one reason alone, I dont trust Icom or their marketing tactics.
>
> I sure do wish TT would take a look at the new Texas Instruments DSP
> chip......its a high speed smoker.
>
>
> 73
> John / N0KHQ / St. Louis
>
> Always on 18.130
>
> Antennas:
>
> You can build 'em better than you can buy 'em
> Please visit the sites below:
> http://www.hamuniverse.com/
> http://cebik.com/nokhq/html
> http://www.ssb-audio.com/forum/
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>