TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion Review By RSGB

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion Review By RSGB
From: "Troy Wideman" <w6hv@surfbest.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:19:47 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
John,
 If you are referring to the Radcomm link, try
http://artinian.bit.si/slike/orion1.gif .
73,
Troy, W6HV

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion Review By RSGB


> Bill Tippett wrote:
>
> > Hi Mario,
> >
> >  >Four scaned pages of Radcomm Orion test report can be found at
> >
<http://artinian.bit.si/slike/orionX.gif>http://artinian.bit.si/slike/orionX
.gif
> > where X stands for 1,2,3,4.
> >
> >         A friend already sent me a copy but thanks for posting that!
> > I feel this was the most thorough review of Orion I've seen including
> > ARRL's.  The only unusual thing I noticed was that the 2.4 kHz filter
> > gave much better IMD performance than the 1.0 kHz filter.  I've never
> > seen that previously in any tests by ARRL, YT1NT, W8JI or Sherwood
> > Engineering, so it could be that the 1.0 kHz filter in the Radcom test
> > unit was defective.
> >
> >                                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV
> >
> > P.S.  BTW, I see Sinisa YT1NT has updated his previous paper at:
> > http://www.geocities.com/va3ttn/UsingOrionRX.pdf
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> Anyone have a better link? This one doesnt work for me.
>
> John N1JM
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>