So what is the cause of this huge discrepancy? The loss of QSK was blatantly
obvious to me and several others and nothing I did seemed to help. We now
have QSK ranges from 15 to 60 WPM depending on who you ask. Believe me, if
QSK had been as good as the Corsair, I would have kept the Orion.
Steve
N4LQ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry N1EU" <n1eu@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:58 PM
Subject: [TenTec] QSK speed versus firmwave version
> FWIW, I've done some test recording of Orion's
> receiver audio recovering from qsk xmsn at various
> speeds with a carrier on frequency, for firmware
> 1.367, 1.369 and 1.370 and don't see any difference at
> all (d'oh)!
>
> BTW, I also tested my Corsair I and it's qsk recovery
> speed is about the same as the Orion.
>
> I'm not a real qsk fanatic so for me this is one big
> non-issue anyway. The Orion is quite a complex system
> so I expect there to be a bit of overhead (delay) in
> transitioning from transmit to receive compared to
> simple hardware-only rigs.
>
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://messenger.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|