To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Sherwood Presentation |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Wed, 19 May 2004 11:43:11 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Buck, K4IA: >The roofing filter may make the IMD figure worse but it also cuts down on the QRM and, very importantly, keeps the AGC circuit from pumping or generating clicks on its own. This is the primary difference I note with the Orion vs my Mark V Field. That Field collapses when there is a signal nearby and I don't think it is because of IMD. You can narrow the filter on the Field to eliminate the QRM from the nearby signal but the AGC pumps so badly (or is the front end overloading?) you can't hear the weaker signal. What you are describing is typically called desense or blocking and is simulated by the Blocking Dynamic Range (BDR) measurement. This is another important metric for receivers which is measured by ARRL, Sherwood, and others. Here is a summary of ARRL's measurements: http://www.elecraft.com/K2_perf.htm#5%20kHz%20numbers Note the BDR measurements in the 3rd (@ 5 kHz) and 4th (@ 20 kHz) columns from the left. Sherwood also lists it as "100 kHz Blocking" in the 5th column from the left here: http://www.sherweng.com/table.html IMD is typically the most critical measurement, which is why many tables like the above rank RX's by close-spaced IMD performance, but BDR, Phase Noise, Sensitivity and other metrics are also important and should be considered as part of the total picture of performance. Sherwood just happened to focus on IMD, but that is by no means the only performance metric. If you happened to have a very close ham neighbor, indeed BDR might be much more important to you. Also, as you start looking at REALLY close-in performance, Phase Noise of the internal synthesizer begins to come into play since it can override IMD performance. This is why you sometimes see terms like "noise limited" for close-in measurements. For example, note the following footnote at the bottom of Sherwood's table above: ^ = Measurement was phase-noise limited rather than intermodulation limited. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Jupiter with external tuner?, Bob Scott |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Jupiter with external tuner?, Stephen Elek, Jr. |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Sherwood Presentation, K4IA |
Next by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] Sherwood Presentation, David E. Shelton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |