To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments |
From: | "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Wed, 5 May 2004 18:41:00 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
There is no question of BPL being legal to start up, under existing part 15 rules, just how it should be regulated and measured. Part 15 does not adequately address other than single device radiators, (point sources) vs. the line source of a radiating transmission line for AC power. -Stuart k5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments, Adam Farson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ScoutII, Stuart Rohre |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments, Adam Farson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments about BPL, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |