| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out |
| From: | "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Tue, 4 May 2004 15:21:41 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Re-read the comments; there was inference to propagated interference. Plenty of references to desired signals being weak SWL or amateur sigs, too. And that antennas would be pointed in a number of directions, and could not be arbitrarily pointed away from power lines in normal use by hams. 73 Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] subject added...rig specs, NJ0IP |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out, Stuart Rohre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] ARRL's BPL NPRM response is out, Bill Tippett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |