To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Finally got a Omni VI+ now I need a CW Elmer |
From: | "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:16:10 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
It was said: Snip' Not to debate the issue, but I have heard folks make the statement they can send faster than they can receive. I guess I'm just old and confused, but for some reason, I can't seem to understand how that is possible....it is not important, but just something that confuses this OF. Snip' I have heard this mentioned before. "Sending faster than you receive" has relative meaning......when you consider, sloppiness, outright errors etc. When those are plugged in the formula, I suspect very few send faster than they receive. IMHO 73, Jin, wd4air _________________________________________________________________ Free up your inbox with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! Multiple plans available. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Finally got a Omni VI+ now I need a CW Elmer, Bill Tippett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Finally got a Omni VI+ now I need a CW Elmer, kd4d |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues), Ken Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Finally got a Omni VI+ now I need a CW Elmer, kd4d |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |