To: | Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>, tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion |
From: | tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:40:47 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Alfred Lorona wrote:Why physically complicate an antenna more than need be? Practically every antenna other than a simple dipole (or inverted V) involves construction and installation problems beyond those required to make and install a dipole. The full wave vertical plane rectangular loop, 1/8 wave by 3/8 wave sides, requires two additional insulators and two additional support 'strings'. Supports may be closer together as it's only 3/8 as opposed to 1/2 wave long. IMO, it blows away a typical 80m dipole at the same height as the top wire of the loop for DX. It works very well on 40 too and as good as a dipole on 60 and 30. Subjective, based on dipoles in the same place the loop occupies now. -bob
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] QST April Article, Bernard |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Problem with 705 mic, Michael Melland, W9WIS |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion, Alfred Lorona |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |