To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion |
From: | Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:31:08 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I have tried the bazooka and double bazooka antennas in the past. I just had to find out what all the rave was about. Yes they are quieter than a wire dipole and yes they are broader than a wire dipole. But so is my 50 ohm dummy load. I have found and concur as stated earlier. The results of the antenna are due to high radiation loss. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] eHam!, Richard Detweiler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Re: eHam!, Martin Ewing |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion, Ken Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion, JAMES HANLON |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |